August 2004 Newsletter

Dairies Can Help
Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Friday, July 23,
2004
By Cookson Beecher, Washington State Staff Writer
LYNDEN, Wash.
As dairy farms grow larger, scientists continue to send out warnings about
the harmful environmental effects of methane and nitrous oxide released
from dairy farms and other livestock operations. According
to scientific reports, greenhouse gases such as methane and carbon dioxide
damage the ozone layer, which in turn leads to global warming.
During the recent
groundbreaking of the first commercial dairy anaerobic digester to be
built in Washington state, visitors to the Vander Haak Dairy in Whatcom
County, Wash., learned about some of the research being done on the subject.
According to a 1974
study, about 65 percent of the methane in the atmosphere comes from agriculture,
with a significant part coming from dairy cows. Thats important
for dairy operators to understand, say scientists, because methane is
about 23 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.
In 2004, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency estimated that agriculture contributed
approximately 7 percent of the U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, most of
that as methane. The intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates
that the concentration of methane in the atmosphere has increased by more
than 150 percent in the last 250 years.
Pointing to Washington
state as an example, the panel said that if half of the states 250,000
dairy cows were on farms with anaerobic-digester systems, up to 100 million
pounds of methane about 3.15 million tons carbon equivalent
could be captured each year.
The upside to using
closed systems of anaerobic digestion to decrease greenhouse gas emissions
is that a wide range of environmental benefits is realized. Examples are
elimination of most methane emissions into the atmosphere, water-quality
protection, nutrient conservation, renewable energy production, and the
elimination of most odor problems.
In addition, the process
creates byproducts that can generate new income streams for the farmers.
This, in turn, will help farmers stay in farming and protect the land
from development.
Marlin Statema, president
of Ferndale, Wash.-based Andgar Corp., project manager for the methane
digester at the Darryl Vander Haak Dairy in northwest Washington, said
the digester represents a technological approach to an environmental and
neighborhood problem.
Its neighbor-friendly,
he said, referring to the elimination of most odors. Its environmentally
friendly, and its profitable. We wouldnt advise a farmer to
do this unless it was profitable.
Andgar has plans to
build a similar, but much larger, system on a California dairy with 6,500
cows. If that happens, it will likely be the largest anaerobic digester
for handling dairy waste in the U.S. While most dairies use lagoon systems
to store manure, those lagoons emit large amounts of methane and nitrous
oxide.
In contrast, a closed
anaerobic digester system eliminates most of those emissions. It also
produces renewable energy, which can be used to power the farm. This green
energy can also be sold to local power companies and used to provide
electricity to households.
This spring, a Marin
County dairy became the latest California farm to generate electricity
from cow manure. Capital Press reported in May that the Straus Family
Creamerys new $280,000 methane digester converts manure from its
cows into electricity, which helps power the farm and creamery.
But even though California
dairies have a total of nearly 2 million cows, the generator at Straus
dairy is only one of five in that state.
But there are signs
that this picture will be changing.
In a recent Dairyline
column by Lee Mielke, a dairy official reported that the San Joaquin Valley
Air Pollution Control Board has decided to require dairy operators to
acquire air pollution permits. To do that, they must make significant
investments to achieve what the board considers a reduction in pollution.
That would include covering lagoons or installing digesters.
|